How to verify MyCryptoParadise results

What CryptoSignalsReview checked, and what it found

CryptoSignalsReview is an independent review site. It ran audit CSR-MCP-RS-2026-07-13, completed on 13 July 2026 and editorially approved on 17 July 2026. It examined eleven annual result sheets: ORIGINAL for 2018 to 2025, and SCALPING for 2023 to 2025. The counts below are CryptoSignalsReview's own arithmetic, not ours.

The record lives on CryptoSignalsReview's own site, at their results verification page. MyCryptoParadise does not own, manage or control CryptoSignalsReview, and cannot edit what it publishes.

The arithmetic behind each rate

One of these numbers deserves a warning label, and it is ours to give. The four buckets add up: 2,605 plus 341 plus 283 plus 221 equals 3,450. The strict rate is clean. Divide 2,605 profitable outcomes by 3,450 rows and you get 75.51%.

The 90.12% figure is the non-loss rate. The only way to reach it from these counts is to treat the 221 cancelled orders as non-losing. That is 2,605 plus 283 plus 221, divided by 3,450. A cancelled order never filled. It is the absence of an outcome, not a good one.

Here is our own arithmetic on the same counts, which you can repeat. Wins plus breakevens across all 3,450 rows is 83.71%. Across the 3,229 rows that actually filled, it is 89.44%. Those are the two figures we think are useful.

We publish 90.12% because CryptoSignalsReview calculated it, and we say in the same breath that it counts the 221 cancelled orders as non-losses. We publish how it is built because you can reproduce it with a calculator in about ninety seconds.

Two more definitions, because these two get confused everywhere including, until recently, on this site. Profit factor is gross profit divided by gross loss. At 6.92 across all 3,450 rows it says that for every unit lost across the whole record, 6.92 was won. It is an aggregate of the book. It is not a risk to reward, and writing it as "1 to 6.92" would claim something the record does not support.

Reward to risk is the shape of a trade, and CryptoSignalsReview calculates it per strategy rather than as one blended number. Read its basis before you read the numbers: it is the mean of the top 10% of winning signals divided by the mean stop-loss result, so it describes the good end of the record, not a typical trade. On that basis ORIGINAL averages 1 : 7.22 and SCALPING 1 : 3.65. With our stated scale-out strategy applied they are 1 : 3.25 and 1 : 1.64. CryptoSignalsReview also says plainly that a per-trade reward to risk cannot be derived from the result sheets, because a sheet records what a signal returned rather than the entry, stop and targets it was planned against.

Both figures are gross: before fees, funding and slippage. Neither is what any individual account made, and CryptoSignalsReview did not verify any member's realized return.

How we label a win, a loss, a breakeven and a cancelled order

These are our own definitions, in our words. For CryptoSignalsReview's classification rules, read its record page rather than this one.

• Profitable outcome: the published trade reached a published target before the published hard stop.
• Loss: the published hard stop was hit, or the published invalidation triggered and the trade closed down.
• Breakeven: the trade closed without a material gain or loss.
• Cancelled order: the entry zone never filled, so the trade never existed. It is counted separately, and it is not a win.

Every signal is published with its entry zone, its targets, its hard stop and its invalidation, before the outcome is known. There is one entry at one position size. There is no averaging down, which is the usual way a losing trade gets turned into a flat one.

The result sheets, and how to check a SHA-256 hash yourself

A hash proves one thing only. The file you downloaded is byte for byte the file that was hashed. It does not prove the contents are true. Anyone who tells you a SHA-256 hash makes results tamper-proof is overselling it, and that includes us.

1. Open the CryptoSignalsReview record page and obtain the result sheet you want to check, along with the SHA-256 hash CryptoSignalsReview published for it.
2. The hash is a 64-character string. If you cannot locate it, ask CryptoSignalsReview for it directly.
3. On macOS, open Terminal, type shasum -a 256 followed by a space, drag the PDF into the window, then press Enter.
4. On Windows, open PowerShell and run Get-FileHash filename.pdf -Algorithm SHA256
5. On Linux, run sha256sum filename.pdf
6. Compare the string your computer prints with the one CryptoSignalsReview published. They should match character for character.
7. If they match, the file has not been altered since CryptoSignalsReview recorded it. If they do not match, that file is not the audited file. Tell us, and tell them.

That is the limit of what a hash does. To test whether the rows describe real trades, use the next section.

How to spot-check the results against the live channels

We publish every signal in the public Telegram channels at the time, with its entry, targets and stop, before the outcome is known. That is our claim, not part of what CryptoSignalsReview verified. The free Original and Scalping results channels are open, so you can test it yourself.

1. Open a result sheet and pick three rows at random, from as far apart in time as the channel history allows. Picking the rows we highlight would defeat the point.
2. Note the date, the pair, the entry zone, the targets and the stop.
3. Open the free public results channel for that product and scroll back to that date: ORIGINAL results or SCALPING results. Scrolling to the earliest post also shows how far the visible history reaches.
4. Check that the original signal matches the sheet: same pair, same entry, same targets, same stop, posted before the move.
5. Check the outcome message that follows it.
6. Now do the same with a losing row. There are 341 of them, and those are the rows worth checking.

If a row does not reconcile, write to [email protected] with the date and the pair. We will publish the correction.

The deletion problem, stated plainly

Here is the weakest point in any Telegram track record, ours included. A channel owner can delete a message permanently, and the deletion leaves no trace. CryptoSignalsReview states this limitation in its record. The history available at review time cannot prove whether messages were deleted before it was captured.

So the honest reading of 3,450 verified rows is this. They are the rows that were visible when the review took place. A review can confirm that what is published adds up. It cannot resurrect what was never published.

We are not asking you to solve that with trust. Every signal posts in the free public channels before the outcome is known. Start your own capture today. Screenshot it, archive it, or point any channel-archiving tool at it. If something ever disappears, you will hold the copy and we will not.

The years are not equal

Eight years of results contain very different market conditions. Some years in the verified window sit far below the full-sample rate, and our worst year is well below it.

We will not quote our best year to balance that. We will not quote a single weak year for credit either. A single year proves nothing in either direction.

The full year by year breakdown sits in the result sheets. Each sheet covers one product for one year, so you can compute any single year yourself instead of taking an average from us. If you want one number from us, use the full sample: 75.51% across 3,450 rows.

Who runs MyCryptoParadise, and since when

Two dates, and they belong in one sentence. MyCryptoParadise operated since 2016 and was incorporated as MyCryptoParadise s.r.o. in Prague in 2025, on 19 November 2025, under company registration number 23963581.

So the team traded together for nine years before incorporating. We say that plainly, because the alternative is you finding the 2025 date somewhere else and assuming we hid it. The company is young. The track record is not.

Note the second gap as well. The verified window starts on 1 January 2018, not 2016. The 2016 and 2017 signals exist in the channel history, and they were not part of this review. Treat them as unverified.

The founder is Simon Mach. MyCryptoParadise publishes trading signals and education. It is not a licensed financial adviser.

It also offers a private account management service, open only to ParadiseFamilyVIP veteran members, in which the team trades a client's own exchange account by secure API. In that service the client's capital never leaves the client's own exchange, and MyCryptoParadise never holds, receives or withdraws it.

Two things that paragraph does not say, and should. Not holding your funds protects you from us moving them. It does not protect you from losing them: the account is traded, and trading it can lose money. And CryptoSignalsReview did not review this service. Its verification covers the published ParadiseFamilyVIP signal record, and reaches no conclusion about private account management.

About the press coverage, honestly

You may have seen MyCryptoParadise mentioned on Bitcoin.com, Benzinga and Yahoo Finance. Those are not three independent reviews. The Benzinga and Yahoo Finance items are the same press release, distributed by GlobeNewswire. The Bitcoin.com piece carries a sponsor notice.

A company announcement carried by a wire service is a company announcement. We are not going to put three logos in a row and let you read them as endorsement. That is the exact move made by the operators you are worried about.

As of 31 July 2026, MyCryptoParadise has no independent editorial press coverage. When that changes, this line changes.

Conflicts you should know about

CryptoSignalsReview also lists MyCryptoParadise at position 1 in its Best 21 ranking. We did not choose that position and we cannot change it. Verification and ranking are separate decisions on their side. You are entitled to weigh the ranking less because of it.

We also pay CryptoSignalsReview for one thing, and it is not the verification. Their market-wide reviews are free. The designed result sheets are a paid product, and we bought them because we wanted the record presented properly.

Here is the wider point. Any verification you read anywhere may be commercially arranged, and that is a fair thing to ask about. It is also why this page does not ask you to stop at a badge. Check the hashes. Check the rows against the channels. Ask CryptoSignalsReview about their methods and terms directly.

Where to check MyCryptoParadise for yourself

• Independent: the CryptoSignalsReview record page, on their domain, where the sheets and hashes live.
• Independent: the free public results channels on Telegram, where signals and outcomes post in real time: ORIGINAL and SCALPING.
• Independent: the Czech public commercial register, company registration number 23963581, which returns MyCryptoParadise s.r.o. and its registered seat in Prague.
• Ours, not independent: our market base-rates page at /crypto-signals-statistics/. Across 3,074 dated sentiment readings spanning more than eight years, conditions were fear or worse on 52.2% of days.
• Ours, not independent: the founder and the team behind the signals, at /our-story/.

How to check any crypto signals provider, including this one

This checklist is not about MyCryptoParadise. Run it on every provider you are considering, and run it on us.

1. Ask for at least several hundred completed trades. A short sample proves nothing in either direction.
2. Check that the record includes losses, in the same detail as the wins. A record with no losing trades is a record with deletions.
3. Check that entry, targets and stop were published before the outcome, in a timestamped public place.
4. Compare the average win against the average loss, not only the win rate. A high win rate with unlimited downside is worse than a low one with a hard stop.
5. Ask what happens to an order that never fills, and whether it is counted in the headline rate.
6. Ask whether the numbers are gross or net, and what fees, funding and slippage are assumed.
7. Find the legal entity, the jurisdiction and the registration number, then look them up in that country's register.
8. Find a named human and a working phone number.
9. Check whether third-party verification exists, who paid for it, and whether that verifier has ever published a negative verdict.
10. Watch for profit screenshots, member testimonials and countdown timers sitting next to the evidence.

How to reach a human

Questions people actually ask

Crypto trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. MyCryptoParadise publishes signals and education, not personal financial advice. Never trade money you cannot afford to lose.

Last updated: 31 July 2026. Verification reference CSR-MCP-RS-2026-07-13, editorially approved 17 July 2026. This page is reviewed whenever the record changes.

If you want to see how the signals actually read, the free public results channels are open and cost nothing. If you would rather talk to a person first, book the introductory call or ring +420 720 069 420.